
Last Updated July 3rd
Caspian Tern Colony Counts East Sand Island The high and low on-colony counts for the past week on East Sand Island were 13,765 terns and 8,855 terns, respectively. The annual photo census of the Caspian tern colony on East Sand Island was conducted on 23 May. Once the aerial photos are counted (Fall 2007) we will be able to accurately estimate colony size and determine whether there has been a significant change in colony size since 2006.
We have discontinued regular monitoring of Rice Island and the other upper estuary dredge disposal islands for early signs of nesting (e.g., nest scrape digging) because the chances of Caspian terns initiating nesting in the upper estuary this late in the season are essentially nil. . The previous week (19-20 June) we conducted boat surveys of Rock Island (located on the mid-Columbia River in the John Day Pool), Goose Island (located in Potholes Reservoir), and Dry Falls Island (located in Banks Lake). Caspian terns were observed to be nesting at each of these sites. During these surveys, one, 85, and 20 Caspian tern chicks were counted on Rock Island, Goose Island, and Dry Falls Island, respectively. Although Caspian terns have nested at each of these sites in previous years, successful nesting (fledging of young) has only been documented consistently at Goose Island (i.e., with up to 50, 103, and 122 tern fledglings counted in 2004, 2005, and 2006, respectively). Caspian terns were first observed nesting on Rock Island in 2005, when 6 pairs attempted to nest there and at least one young was fledged from the colony. The Rock Island Caspian tern colony increased dramatically to 110 nesting pairs in 2006, but subsequently failed due to mink predation on all tern eggs and chicks produced at the colony. A total of 21 tern chicks and some nests with eggs were counted on Dry Falls Island in 2006, but successful nesting during that year was not confirmed (i.e., since the island was not visited during the later part of the breeding season). Nesting Caspian terns have not been observed at other potential colony sites along the mid-Columbia River so far this year.
Avian predation rates often vary by salmonid species, run-type, stock, and rearing type (hatchery vs. wild). Furthermore, predation rates for specific groups of fish can vary greatly from one year to the next. Despite this well-documented variation, few data are available to determine which biotic and abiotic factors account for differences in smolt vulnerability to avian predators. One method to evaluate the potential intrinsic and extrinsic factors affecting relative vulnerability of smolts to avian predation is to PIT-tag smolts and subsequently recover their tags on bird colonies following the breeding season. This year, we initiated a pilot study whereby run-of-the-river steelhead smolts encountered at the juvenile fish facilities at Lower Monumental and Ice Harbor dams on the lower Snake River are PIT-tagged, weighed, measured, photographed (for condition scoring), and released back into the river to resume their out-migration. Following the breeding season, PIT tags will be recovered from various bird colonies in order to test hypotheses concerning how differences in smolt morphology, condition, abundance, origin, river conditions, and dam operations are associated with differences in smolt vulnerability to avian predation. This past week, 104 steelhead smolts were PIT-tagged at Lower Monumental Dam. We did not sample at Ice Harbor Dam this past week because of a paucity of steelhead in the bypass sample at that dam. Of those steelhead that we PIT-tagged this past week, most were in either excellent (49%) or good (37%) physical condition, with some fish classified as being in fair (14%) or poor (1%) condition. In total, 7,107 steelhead have been PIT-tagged at either Lower Monumental or Ice Harbor dams as part of this study. This concludes our PIT-tagging of steelhead at Lower Monumental and Ice Harbor dams in 2007. In the coming weeks we will begin our effort to recover PIT tags at various bird colonies on the Columbia Plateau to determine which biotic and abiotic factors account for differences in smolt vulnerability to avian predators.
This past week at East Sand Island, a total of 7 colony disturbances were observed (all causes) at a rate of 0.8 disturbances/hr of observation. Generally, disturbances at the tern colony are short, causing terns to flush for only 10-30 seconds before returning to the colony. There were no disturbances observed at the Crescent Island tern colony this past week. This past week, gull kleptoparasitism was not observed during fish watch at the East Sand Island tern colony. At Crescent Island, gull kleptoparasitism rates were 1% of all known fates of fish delivered by terns this past week. At the East Sand Island tern colony, kleptoparasitism is by glaucous-winged/western gulls, while at Crescent Island kleptoparasitism is by the smaller California gull. To date, there have been no signs of mammalian predators on any of the tern colonies monitored as part of this study.
On 26 June, Rick Mudge, Madonna Lennon, Schuyler Mudge, Hope Valentine, and Camille Cushman visited the East Sand Island tern colony. On 27 June, Kathleen O’Higgins and Steve Thompson visited the East Sand Island tern colony. |
Site developed and maintained by Real Time Research, Inc. |
Comments about the site? Contact clientservices@realtimeresearch.org |