
Last Updated July 27th
Note: This will be the last weekly update for the 2004 field season. We plan to provide additional updates on a less frequent basis, including a season summary that will be posted in the coming months. East Sand Island The first fledgling (i.e., young-of-the-year capable of flight) was observed at the East Sand Island colony on 19 June. Most tern fledglings have now left the colony, and are either gathered in large groups on the beach or have flown from the island with their parents. Nesting success at the East Sand Island tern colony appears high this year. A second aerial photo census of the Caspian tern colony on East Sand Island was conducted on 3 July. Once these aerial photos are counted and verified we will be able to accurately estimate the number of young terns fledged from the East Sand Island colony this year. Our weekly boat-based surveys to monitor Pillar Rock Sands, Miller Sands Spit, Rice Island, and other upper estuary dredged material disposal islands looking for early signs of nesting (e.g., scrape digging) have been discontinued for this year. No active Caspian tern nests (nest scrapes containing eggs) were detected at any of these upper estuary sites this year, and we do not anticipate the formation of any new colonies this late in the season. The first fledgling (i.e., young-of-the-year capable of flight) was observed at the Crescent Island tern colony on 21 June. Based on preliminary estimates, nesting success at the Crescent Island tern colony has been only fair this year (0.62 fledglings raised per breeding pair), although slightly higher than productivity at this colony last year. We have detected no Caspian terns attempting to nest at other colony sites on the Mid-Columbia River, Lower Snake River, or Lower Yakima River this breeding season. Caspian terns were nesting at two sites on islands in Potholes Reservoir near Moses Lake, WA; terns nesting at one of these sites (Solstice Is.) failed due to rising water levels that flooded low lying nests and black-crowned night-heron predation on the remaining nests (C. Moranto, University of Washington, pers. comm.). Nesting success at the other colony on Potholes Reservoir (Goose Is.) was low this year.
For the week, 56% of the identifiable fish delivered to the Crescent Island tern colony (N = 150) were salmonids, a similar percentage as compared to the previous week (54%). Most of the non-salmonids observed being delivered to the Crescent Island colony were centrarchids (e.g., bass, sunfish; 31%). Year to date, 70% of the identifiable fish delivered to the Crescent Island tern colony (N = 3,100) were salmonids (this cumulative percent is an average of the previous weeks’ percentages). This compares to 68% salmonids in the diet of Crescent Island terns by this time last year.
Earlier this season, a net pen was deployed near Crescent Island and stocked with approximately 1,000 PIT-tagged juvenile rainbow trout to investigate (1) PIT tag deposition rates at the Crescent Island tern colony, (2) vulnerability of fish in different size classes to tern predation, and (3) gull kleptoparasitism rates on fish captured by terns at the net pen. The net pen and the surrounding slough were monitored 8 – 15 hrs/day, 7 days/week, from 24 April to 4 June. A net was placed over the net pen after each observation period to prevent terns and other predators from feeding on fish held in the pen when observers were not present. On 26 April, Caspian terns began foraging on fish within the net pen. During the 40-day study period, a total of 94 PIT-tagged trout were removed from the net pen by Caspian terns during 207 attempts (i.e., plunge dives into the net pen). No other predators were observed removing PIT-tagged trout from the net pen, with the exception of Forster’s terns, which removed a total of 43 fish from the net pen. Following the breeding season and after all the terns and gulls have left their respective colonies, the Crescent Island tern and gull colonies will be scanned for PIT tags by NOAA Fisheries. The number of PIT tags that were removed from the net pen by terns and subsequently detected on the Crescent Island tern and gull colonies will be used to address the research objectives listed above.
At East Sand Island , one colony disturbance was observed this past week, for a rate of 0.2 disturbances/hr of observation. At Crescent Island, no colony disturbances were observed this past week. Generally, colony disturbances are short, causing terns to flush for only 10-30 seconds before returning to the colony. During plot watches, no nest predation was observed at the East Sand Island or Crescent Island tern colonies this past week. This past week, gull kleptoparasitism rates at East Sand Island were 3% of all known fates of fish delivered by terns. At Crescent Island, gull kleptoparasitism rates were 11% of all known fates of fish delivered by terns this past week. At the East Sand Island tern colony, kleptoparasitism is by glaucous-winged/western gulls, while at Crescent Island kleptoparasitism is by the smaller Californiagull. There were no signs of mammalian predators on any of the tern colonies monitored as part of this study in 2004.
Some of the captive-reared fledglings were subjects in an experiment designed to better understand the passage rates and route of egestion for PIT tags consumed when Caspian terns eat a PIT-tagged salmonid smolt. During the 8-day experiment, all PIT tags egested by the tern fledglings were regurgitated in castings of indigestible material (e.g., fish bones), instead of defecated. Some PIT tags were regurgitated less than four hours after they were consumed in a fish. Estimates of the mean retention time for ingested PIT tags, together with information on the time of day when PIT tags were regurgitated, will help us calculate predation rates on salmonid smolts by Caspian terns based on recovery rates of smolt PIT tags on tern nesting colonies. There were no visitors to the East Sand Island tern colony this past week. |
Site developed and maintained by Real Time Research, Inc. |
Comments about the site? Contact clientservices@realtimeresearch.org |